Talk:OneTaste

OneTaste funded "study" by Nicole Prause

Nicole Prause#Orgasmic_meditation_study

I added the information about the founder, but User:Primefac removed it two times in a row.

This cult, under investigation by the FBI, tries to "proof" their propaganda with pseudoscientific studies payed by themselfs!

Check the discussion here.

--KleinerKorrektor (talk) 12:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

OP has been warned of discretionary sanctions, and that using the word pseudoscientific lightly will lead to a topic ban. tgeorgescu (talk) 17:46, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Unconditional Freedom Project now openly part of the OneTaste organization

Now that the Mendocino County Sheriff has no more association with the Unconditional Freedom Project they're openly claiming ownership. It would seem that the organization isn't as defunct as it appeared to be. Rectitudo (talk) 13:42, 8 June 2023 (UTC)

References

OneTaste is actively holding events in their North Bay location, so they're clearly still active as an organization [1] Nicole held an event there yesterday as of this writing. Rectitudo (talk) 03:20, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Rebranding as The Eros Project

The Eros Platform feature classes and events hosted by both Nicole Daedone and Rachael Cherwitz on their site. Some of their logos incorporate the Onetaste branding, although they appear to be trying to scrub those. This is pretty plainly the same organization with slightly altered branding. Rectitudo (talk) 01:29, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

You have to have reliable sources that say so. You cannot determine this yourself. Skyerise (talk) 02:53, 8 February 2024 (UTC)

@Skyerise They plainly state on their own page that they're "by Onetaste". You don't get any more reliable than that. 162.192.2.81 (talk) 03:19, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

You just don't get it. We need third-party sourcing because they could be lying. Skyerise (talk) 03:32, 9 February 2024 (UTC)

Also, a new registered business under a different name is a distinct topic, even if run by some of the same people. If it is notable, a new article should be written about it from third-party sources. If that can't be done, then it's not notable and should not be coatracked onto another article. Skyerise (talk) 11:48, 9 February 2024 (UTC)