Talk:Once (Nightwish album)

Latest comment: 5 years ago by Phil Bridger in topic Please delete

Untitled

edit

um, who made this album? Gentgeen 03:15, 20 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

Cleanup

edit

Someone had added a cleanup template to the track listing section, which i removed. If you really want it to be there, please explain what should be cleaned up. bbx 13:09, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

OK, first - there's no reason for "4 million copies" to be bolded, it's completely unprofessional. Second - the source cited says over 1 million copies, not 4 million. I'm changing it back to 1 million, feel free to go back if you can find a source to support the claim of 4 million copies sold. --Random person, 30 August 2008 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.162.86.47 (talk) 07:04, 30 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

statue on the cover??

edit

hey, that statue of an angel on the cover, i think it exists somewhere.. does anybody know where it is?? --PASSIVE (Talk|E-Mail) 17:41, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Coincidentally, I just ran into a picture of it on the web. Do a search for Nightwish on flickr.com and you'll see it passing by.—♦♦ SʘʘTHING(Я) 17:45, 13 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Its Called "Angel of grief" and was orginal made in 1894 original by William Wetmore Story. But there is also one at Stanford university, which was made in the eraly 1900, and is as I understand much bigger. 22 August 2006 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Eyelessfade (talkcontribs) 00:58, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Interestingly it also appears on the cover of Evanescence EP from 1998. —Ben FrantzDale 01:51, 21 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Album Numerology

edit

It says on the page that 'Once' is the sixth album from Nightwish; isn't it the fifth? The previous album 'Century Child' is marked as the fourth, and 'Once' comes right after, making it fifth.

The only reason 'Once' would be marked as the sixth album is if you count the EP 'Over the hills and far away' as being an album, but you shouldn't do that: Full-length studio albums are albums. EPs are regurgitations*.

For the purpose of an enciclopedia EPs shouldn't be conidered LPs, but for common sense if the material is not featured in the other studio non-compilation LPs are studio albums as the LPs. It's plain stupid to not consider them part of a discography — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.232.236.152 (talk) 09:52, 29 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Nightwish - Nemo.ogg

edit
 

Image:Nightwish - Nemo.ogg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 00:49, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

"The Falador Massacre"

edit

This particular section needs to be either heavily edited or completely deleted. It does not contribute anything meaningful to the article, is confusing, lacks clarity and relevance, and fails to display rationale behind its statements. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Felojiro (talkcontribs) 20:21, 27 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

DVD-Audio version

edit

I see that there is no mention of the DVD-Audio version of Once. It would be helpful to list any mastering differences, bonus videos, bonus songs, and/or the differences in bit-rates and quality. I do not own the DVDA so I do not feel qualified to talk about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.28.228.112 (talk) 05:38, 9 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

edit

I hate the circular references, if you click e.g. Higher than Hope or Ghost Love Score, you'll just end up back here! --84.249.164.59 (talk) 02:54, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Romanticide live

edit

I have removed this sentence: ("Romanticide" was only performed with Anette Olzon on vocals in 2008).

Romanticide premiered live in 2009, at Brixton Academy in London. It featured Marco and Anette on vocals. If someone wants to put a corrected sentence to this effect back into the article, feel free. However I don't think it's worth it as that part of the article is detailing songs that HAVE NOT been played live. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.166.104 (talk) 23:10, 7 May 2010 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Once (Nightwish album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Once (Nightwish album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:56, 15 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Please delete

edit

This page be speedy deleted as an attack or a negative unsourced biography of a living person, because a significant portion of the article is a personal and unsourced attack on an eminent, Grammy-Nominated Native American artist, John Two-Hawks. This issue has been flagged and no action taken. --37.228.255.242 (talk) 17:58, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply

I agree that the section in question was unreliably sourced, but that is reason to remove that section, which you could have done, and indeed are encouraged to do, yourself, rather than to delete the whole article. If you see such things in articles then please don't be frightened to edit them out yourself. There's no need to ask for anyone's permission, and if you make a mistake in good faith then someone will come along and fix it. Phil Bridger (talk) 19:02, 17 February 2019 (UTC)Reply