This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article was originally based on one in Camerapedia, retrieved at an unknown date under the GNU Free Documentation License.
"Based on" implies that the text was revised or otherwise modified, and that does not appear to be the case with this article. It is peppered with template red links that, presumably, have some relevance at Camerapedia. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 15:02, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article is very long - extremely long given the subject, in my opinion. I think it could benefit from a drastic trimming. Also, the introduction seems quite poor: at no point are we explicitly told this is a type of camera! Olaf Davis | Talk 18:59, 20 April 2008 (UTC)Reply
.svg)
.jpg){kind=small}