NPOV issues

edit

Phrases such as "because he did not comply with the ridiculous rules of political obedience" and "He never was a slave of the Soviet system, and the system never let him have his freedom.", among others, are not NPOV and needed to be revised. For that matter, no citations are offered for them. The whole article, or at least the second half of it, sounds like someone's personal opinion.

removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV

edit

I've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:

This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
  1. There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
  2. It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
  3. In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.

Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:51, 22 June 2013 (UTC)Reply