Talk:Old Dutch Foods
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editIs this article a stub?
Beef jerky
editOld Dutch has been selling beef jerky (at least in Canada) for much longer than 2005.
- I can vouch for Canada's Old Dutch selling beef jerky since at least the mid-90s... The US variety seems to be different though. Compare http://www.olddutchfoods.com/our_products/index.php (bottom right) to http://olddutchfoods.ca/products/categoryProducts.cfm?typeid=9 (top right). The US beef jerky seems to be the normal, sliced up meat sold in a bag type, whereas the Canadian is a processed and formed flat stick sold in a box to stores and individually to customers. They don't appear to have the "Bac'n Puffs" or Pepperoni/"Super Beef" Sticks in the US either. For that matter, it looks like the US brand doesn't have Ketchup chips, and Salt n Vinegar is apparently only available in the Dutch Crunch line. Worth noting if an American can confirm. --Msgohan 19:28, 19 August 2006 (UTC)
Ketchup flavor
editThey introduced a bizarre "ketchup flavored" potato chip around 1975 when I lived in Winnipeg. They had these freaky redd-ish splotches on them. Yucky! Rob Banzai 18:36, 16 August 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject Food and drink Tagging
editThis article talk page was automatically added with {{WikiProject Food and drink}} banner as it falls under Category:Food or one of its subcategories. If you find this addition an error, Kindly undo the changes and update the inappropriate categories if needed. The bot was instructed to tagg these articles upon consenus from WikiProject Food and drink. You can find the related request for tagging here . If you have concerns , please inform on the project talk page -- TinucherianBot (talk) 14:30, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
Proposed merge with Humpty Dumpty Snack Foods
editmergeto parent company DGG ( talk ) 01:18, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
- My feeling is to leave the article, there is no need for a merge. The company is still a subsidiary (the brand still exists), and the page is sourced and meets GNG. I don't see a need. Garchy (talk) 18:03, 3 April 2017 (UTC)