Research edit

The History of ONGC should begin with the history of oil exploration and discoveries. Talk of ASTO and people who sold shares to the public is irrelevant. Where is the mention of Ankleshwar, Cambay, Assam, Bombay High? Who contributed more - Manglik or Talukdar? Please do not remove tags before answering this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Powereditor (talkcontribs) 03:43, 21 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Request edit

Technical analysis of ongc —Preceding unsigned comment added by 61.11.73.87 (talk) 08:40, 4 December 2006

This all reads like a page from ONGC's corporate webpage ... no mention of the Bombay High disaster at all (11 people dead, complete destruction of the MHN process platform in the four platform complex; severe damage to the MHF accommodation platform and the NA wellhead platform ...). Appalling! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 62.232.89.149 (talk) 08:42, 15 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

HQ edit

Please Check the link below and decide for yourself...http://www.ongcindia.com/offices.asp Its still Dehradun according to the official ONGC Site — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sanketsingh (talkcontribs) 08:04, 27 December 2006

This report
gives an address of Indira Chowk, New Delhi. Has the HQ moved from Dehradun to New Delhi?
--Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 09:21, 11 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

The headquarters of ONGC IS at Dehradun rather than Delhi. I work here so I know!--Arghyadeepd (talk) 09:00, 18 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

resource; India Faces Standoff With China on Sea Oil By Jeremy Page in Beijing and Tom Wright in New Delhi September 23, 2011. edit

resource; India Faces Standoff With China on Sea Oil By Jeremy Page in Beijing and Tom Wright in New Delhi September 23, 2011. See Territorial disputes in the South China Sea regarding Phu Khanh Basin and Nam Con Son Basin with TNK-BP and Petrovietnam. 97.87.29.188 (talk) 17:01, 23 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oil and Natural Gas Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:07, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

ongc edit

objective ,need, scope 2409:4070:2D47:FCF3:F013:4217:106D:BCB3 (talk) 06:16, 5 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed merge of ONGC Petro Additions Dahej Complex into Oil and Natural Gas Corporation edit

On behalf of Klbrain, adding an article maintenance tag to discuss the merger of ONGC Petro Additions Dahej Complex with Oil and Natural Gas Corporation's page. Charlie (talk) 16:42, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Merge case: that the ONGC Petro Additions Dahej Complex is a stub best merged for context; the current page here is short enough that a split doesn't seem warranted. Much of the content was already on the former version of this page suggesting that this was undiscussed WP:SPLIT warranting reversal. Klbrain (talk) 17:06, 9 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Supporting the merge: checked the former version of the page and concurred with the reasoning for the merge. Charlie (talk) 12:35, 10 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
@Klbrain We should conclude this discussion and move forward with the merge. Charlie (talk) 17:42, 21 April 2024 (UTC)Reply
    Y Merger complete. Klbrain (talk) 17:16, 23 April 2024 (UTC)Reply