Talk:Ohio State Route 701

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Dough4872 in topic GA Review
Good articleOhio State Route 701 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 8, 2011Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Ohio State Route 701/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dough4872 02:10, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    • The sentence "For its entire distance, SR 701 passes amidst open farmland, with a few patches of trees abutting the side of the highway, and the occasional home appearing along the way." needs to be reworded.
    This statement has been re-worded. DanTheMan474 (talk) 03:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
    • Do not use "then" in describing progression of route.
    The sentence that included "then" has been re-worded. DanTheMan474 (talk) 03:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    • Yahoo Maps does not show the township boundaries. Can another map be used to verify this?
    The 2004 DeLorme Ohio Atlas provides details on township boundaries. This has been added as a source. DanTheMan474 (talk) 03:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    An image of the road would be nice, but not required.
    There are no available images for the article at this time. DanTheMan474 (talk) 03:42, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  

I will place the article on hold for a few minor fixes. Dough4872 02:10, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

I will now pass the article. Dough4872 03:50, 8 August 2011 (UTC)Reply