Talk:Odwalla/GA1
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Jerem43 in topic GA Pass/Fail
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
GA Pass/Fail
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
The primary editor has done a great job upgrading the status of this article from a list to an informative article.
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- All good here.
- B. MoS compliance:
- From what I have seen and read, yes it does meet the standards of the MoS.
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- I have verified all the references.
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- It easily conforms to the standards of WP:NOR.
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Coverage of the aspects of the company history, operations and products are present.
- B. Focused:
- I stays on target.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- It fully meets the the standards of WP:NPOV.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Yes
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- All images have fair use tags
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- All images have descriptive captions
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Good job, hope the hard work has paid off.
- Pass or Fail:
--Jeremy ( Blah blah...) 18:01, 30 August 2008 (UTC)