This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mammals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mammal-related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MammalsWikipedia:WikiProject MammalsTemplate:WikiProject Mammalsmammal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palaeontology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of palaeontology-related topics and create a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PalaeontologyWikipedia:WikiProject PalaeontologyTemplate:WikiProject PalaeontologyPalaeontology articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
the paper I got the cladogram from included several non-odobenid species, but labelled them as such and excluded several species that are otherwise considered odobenids. I haven't found a more recent cladogram that doesn't have these characteristics... Audrey.m.horn (talk) 18:09, 17 November 2019 (UTC)Reply
The cladogram appropriately includes taxa outside the Odobendiae, but it doesn't demarcate the Odobenidae clade itself, which is important. MicroProf (talk) 21:04, 19 February 2020 (UTC)Reply
