Talk:October Rebellion/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   A few comments:

   • Avoid linking dates. (fixed)
   • Remember to state the country. For some reason, Americans almost always seem to forget this vital information. (fixed)
   • The further reading link is dead. (fixed)
   • {{commonscat}} should be in the "external links" section. (fixed)
   • Three of the external links are removed. WP:EL is very restrictive on non-official sites. External links should be used as little as possible, and ideally only official sites should be used.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   • There is no need to state that references are in English; they are presumed this by default. Foreign-language sources should of course state the language. (fixed)

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   After having performed a copyedit, the article now meets the GA criteria. Congratulations! Arsenikk ^(talk) 11:44, 11 May 2009 (UTC)