Talk:Occupy Regina
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 17 November 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was merge to Occupy Canada. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Occupy Regina redirect. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
| This page is not a forum for general discussion about Occupy Regina. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this redirect. You may wish to ask factual questions about Occupy Regina at the Reference desk. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Keep this article! edit
This is relevant on it's own and it should be kept. Why delete any information? This is censorship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Arek3xSL (talk • contribs) 07:03, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Keep! edit
Keep this going — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.47.150.7 (talk) 15:38, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Keep! edit
The Occupy movement has the potential to radically alter the focus of public policy for years to come. While its full impact will not be known for some time it is clear that it is far too early to either write off the movement or declare its aims and objectives realized. Canada is a very diverse nation; you simply cannot group every instance of Occupy under one banner and pretend to fairly describe the nuances of the movement. The Maritimes, Newfoundland and Labrador, Northern Canada, Central Canada, the Prairies and the West Coast all have very unique characteristics that results in movements like Occupy being realized differently in each of these regions. It would be a shame to lose a chronicle of how the movement manifested itself in each of these regions by mashing it into a single parent article; this would be an over-simplification and demonstrate a glaring ignorance of the way political movements like this impact the nation at a regional level. It would be like combining the Reform and PC Party articles with the Conservative Party of Canada article because the political ideologies are similar. For now, let's wait and see what happens. It doesn't make sense to destroy information at this stage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Stephenfeltmate (talk • contribs) 19:05, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Keep the page edit
Keep the page up please. This is actually happening. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.47.229.217 (talk) 20:55, 20 November 2011 (UTC)
Merge performed edit
I've merged all information from this article to Occupy Canada, per the AfD result for this article. However, there is some discussion regarding the possibility of challenging the AfD result occurring on the Occupy Canada page here: Talk: Occupy Canada—Occupy Regina merger with Occupy Canada. Therefore, I am not blanking the page at this time. Northamerica1000(talk) 09:36, 1 December 2011 (UTC)