Obinna Oleka was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (June 18, 2022). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
Obinna Oleka was nominated as a good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (March 7, 2021). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Obinna Oleka/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 13:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
Am reviewing this article for the GAN March 2021 Backlog Drive. MWright96 (talk) 13:41, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Lead edit
- It would be better for the lead to be more than just a single sentence in one paragraph such as adding more of Oleka's achievements
Early life edit
- "Oleka grew up in Washington, D.C. with his mother and brother." - a reference is needed to verify the accuracy of this information
- "He played high school basketball at Florida Christian Institute in Cape Coral, Florida, where he averaged 24 points and 11 rebounds as a senior." - same issue as above
- "He also played AAU ball with DC Assault." - Amateur Athletic Union basketball
State College of Florida, Manatee–Sarasota edit
- "However, he was academically ineligible to play for a major college, so he instead started playing JUCO ball at the State College of Florida, Manatee–Sarasota (SCF Manatee–Sarasota) in 2012. " - a reference is required to verify that this portion of text is correct
- "February 18–24, 2013" - 18 to 24,
- "During his second season, he signed a letter of intent (LOI) with the Texas Longhorns," - letter of intent (LOI) to play college basketball with
- "He was subsequently released from his LOI by Texas." - a slight reword is in order since it is too close to the wording in The Arizona Republic
- "while taking classes at Cecil College in North East, Maryland." - The Arizona Republic only says Maryland not North East, Maryland
Arizona State edit
- "In the spring of 2015," - avoid using seasons per MOS:SEASON
- "He made his debut as a Sun Devil" - for the team
- "He made his debut as a Sun Devil against Sacramento State on November 13, 2015," - will need an extra reference that explicitly states this information
- "In 32 games, he had averages of 9.6 points and 6.1 rebounds per contest while the Sun Devils lost in the quarterfinals of the 2015 Pac-12 Conference Tournament." - this sentence is not referenced and a reliable citation that explicitly states this information will need to be added to the end of it
- "In 2016–17, Oleka started all but one of the 33 games he played, averaging 12.5 points and 9.9 rebounds per game." - same issue as above
- "Despite being 6’8," - the {{convert}} template will need to be used on the text in bold
- "It was his 15th double-double of the season, tying Ike Diogu for the most in school history since they joined the then-Pac-10 Conference in 1978." - this sentence will need to be verified by a reliable source
- "However, the Sun Devils lost by a score of 80–57 to Oregon, again in the quarterfinals, in what was Oleka's final college game. His 327 rebounds that year were the third-best mark in school history at the time." - both of these sentences will need reliable sources backing them up
Professional career edit
- "averaging 9.3 points and 8.7 rebounds per game." - needs a reliable citation to verify this information
- "but went undrafted in the 2017 NBA draft." - same issue as above
- "He played in a limited role off the bench for the club, appearing in 13 games and averaging 2.5 points and 2.8 rebounds per contest before leaving in January 2018." - same issue as above
- "In 23 games with the Edge, he averaged 7.6 points and 10.4 rebounds in 24.8 minutes per game." - a reliable citation is needed to verify this sentence
- "He parted ways with the team in January 2020." - same issue as above
Career statistics: College edit
- The college statistics table needs to be completely verified with reliable sources
Personal life edit
- "Oleka is of Nigerian descent, and has a Nigerian passport." - needs a citation to verify
References edit
- Reference 11 "2017 team rosters" is missing the publisher and access date
- References 15, 16, 17, 22, 23, 24 and 25 need to include the translated titles of the Spanish language titles
- Reference 26 needs to mention the translated title from its original Hungarian title
- Same issue for Reference 29, a Swedish language reference
- Reference 20 "Men in the middle were centrepieces in St. John's Edge's win over Lightning" is from Newsbreak, a deprecated source per WP:RSP. According to that page, as an news aggregator, it must be replaced by the original source
There are too many issues to be addressed in a GA review, and will therefore fail this review. The article can be renominated once the nominator has addressed all of the points raised above. MWright96 (talk) 15:55, 7 March 2021 (UTC)
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Obinna Oleka/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Kaleeb18 (talk · contribs) 00:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
I'll be looking over this article using the table below. ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 00:32, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- Seeing as it has been a while and nothing has changed I will have to fail this ― Kaleeb18TalkCaleb 23:10, 18 June 2022 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. | ||
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). |
| |
2c. it contains no original research. |
| |
2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism. |
| |
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |