 | This article was nominated for deletion on 16 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This page was proposed for deletion by Philosophus (talk · contribs) on 28 April 2009 with the comment: Borderline G11/A7 CSD. This was created by an account that has only edited articles on the article subject and Spot.us. Given the subject of this article built Spot.us, it is incredibly likely that the author is the article's subject. While there is assertion of importance (making A7 questionable), there is little evidence of real impact and no independent sources, thus causing this to fail WP:V and WP:N criteria. It was contested by 118.208.63.14 (talk · contribs) on 2009-04-28 |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
71.227.172.219 (talk) 07:39, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Untitled edit
I'd like to second a deletion of the page. There's a million authors of a million random technical books. They are not notable. Neither is this one.
- The venue to make an argument for deletion is Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Obie Fernandez. You may want to read up on what constitutes notability in Wikipedia before you do, though. MLauba (talk) 09:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)