Talk:Oak of Mamre

Palestine Low‑importance

	Palestine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Palestine, a team effort dedicated to building and maintaining comprehensive, informative and balanced articles related to the geographic Palestine region, the Palestinian people and the State of Palestine on Wikipedia. Join us by visiting the project page, where you can add your name to the list of members where you can contribute to the discussions.PalestineWikipedia:WikiProject PalestineTemplate:WikiProject PalestinePalestine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Source edit

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This article is based on content from Orthodox Wiki (Oak of Mamre, a version of 22:56, December 28, 2008 edited last by Ixthis888). Orthodox Wiki's policy unambiguously states that its content may be freely used in Wikipedia under GFDL. So I see no reason to delete it. --CopperKettle 14:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yep, it's fine. Forgive the bot, he can only google... – Toon ^(talk) 23:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wrong photo edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

A 2008 Flickr identification is reliable? RS? The chapel is either not from there at all, or if indeed it is, it's hidden and irrelevant. See here what is indeed visible and the target of all visitors: the church and the old tree (now fallen). The monastery is a large squarish building. Where would this chapel be? Pls look for relevant photo. Old pictures of the oak should be copyright-free. Thanks. Arminden (talk) 22:20, 21 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic