Talk:O. S. Nock

"legacy"

This section:

Nock authored more than 140 books and 1000 magazine articles, which are often considered to be less than authoritative because of his voluminous output.[by whom?] He tended to re-use data, text and anecdotes in different books, including paragraphs culled in their entirety (check similarities in "Steam Locomotive" 1957 & "British Steam Railways" 1962).[citation needed] Having said that, Nock's style is easily read and he explains engineering issues in layman's terms, making the subject more accessible. His continuation of E. L. Ahrons' work, continuing steam locomotive development from 1925, is much more friendly to the layman or armchair enthusiast than Ahrons' seminal work "The British Steam Railway Locomotive Volume 1 From 1825 to 1925".[according to whom?] If his work is treated as a general picture of railways in action, from the personal viewpoint of someone who was there and who interacted with railway personnel at various levels, both professionally and in his leisure time, his output is reasonably valid.[according to whom?] One of his most famous books was 'The Pocket Encyclopedia of British Steam Railways and Locomotives'

Got rewritten - I don't know which of his books are or are not notable - so if anyof this information should go back in, please do it.

However I don't have sources for much of the subjective comment, though his "readable" writing style is noted in the text under "legacy" as are his faults.

I'm actually not that familiar at all with his entire work - so please check the current section and make sure it is not unfair etc. Thank you.Prof.Haddock (talk) 04:07, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Ouevre

The books can be mostly found via the external link in the article - they are generally indexed in libraries (including on the net)- and so should be easy to find. Are there any "seminal" ones (that should be listed)? - (also see section above) - is anyone able to do some proper editorialising to create a list of his better works.?

More importantly the monographs on railway performance etc are not yet listed here - and with over 1000 this would be an obvious size issue - nevertheless the body of work is likely to be a useful source ..

Is there a list of his publications in The Engineer/The Railway Magazine that can be linked to - I really think we need a list .. Prof.Haddock (talk) 04:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on O. S. Nock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140304150750/http://www.gracesguide.co.uk/images/3/37/Er19600610.pdf to http://www.gracesguide.co.uk/images/3/37/Er19600610.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:43, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on O. S. Nock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140203210803/http://www.gracesguide.co.uk/images/e/e9/Er19450817.pdf to http://www.gracesguide.co.uk/images/e/e9/Er19450817.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140203210505/http://www.gracesguide.co.uk/images/9/9a/Er19450824.pdf to http://www.gracesguide.co.uk/images/9/9a/Er19450824.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140221073456/http://www.gracesguide.co.uk/images/8/83/Er19570412.pdf to http://www.gracesguide.co.uk/images/8/83/Er19570412.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)