Talk:Nydalen metro station/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Eisfbnore in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting review.Pyrotec (talk) 21:08, 19 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

This article, which is for a quite new railway station, is compliant with the requirements. Many of the references are in Norsk, but they appear to verify the claims. I'm therefore awarding GA-status.Pyrotec (talk) 19:53, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for taking the time to do the review. Arsenikk (talk) 20:16, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply
Couldn't this be collapsed? __meco (talk) 18:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)Reply
Of course, but there is no point in doing so, unless there are sections with resolved comments. See Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Copenhagen Metro stations/archive1 for an example. --Eisfbnore (talk) 19:31, 28 August 2010 (UTC)Reply