Talk:Nyctibatrachus mewasinghi

Nyctibatrachus mewasinghi has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: December 23, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Nyctibatrachus mewasinghi is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 4 months ago5 comments2 people in discussion

Passed. grungaloo (talk) 15:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nyctibatrachus mewasinghi/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Grungaloo (talk · contribs) 23:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi AryKun - only a few comments on this one! Let me know once you've had a chance to review. grungaloo (talk) 23:57, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
~~See comments~~ Issues addressed
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
Sources check out, no copyvio.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
Major aspects covered. Limited sources exist for this so good coverage of what's available.
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
Meets NPOV
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
No recent reverts or evidence of edit warring
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Appropriate images and captions.
Overall:
Pass/Fail:
~~See comments~~ Passed!

Comments edit

Could add a pushpin map but not necessary for GA.
Male/Female picture labels in speciesbox should be capitalized.
"The following cladogram shows relationships among three species," - "shows relationships among the three species". Since you just listed these 3 in the previous sentence I think you can make this definite.
"The side of the body is slightly lighter than the back, and underside is mainly off-white," - "and the underside is mainly off-white"
"the discs on third finger and fourth toe being well-developed and slightly wider than the finger and toe, respectively" - the discs on the third finger and fourth toe...
Grungaloo, all done. AryKun (talk) 12:15, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Thanks! I'm happy to promote this. Congratulations on another great article and thanks for your work as always! grungaloo (talk) 15:58, 23 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Add topic