Talk:Nutrient pollution

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Xiewy. Peer reviewers: Nestorfi.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 24 August 2021 and 20 December 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): AdyerVU.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:45, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Nutrient pollution. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20130219045824/http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/67057225cc780623852578f10059533d/$file/epa-sab-11-013-unsigned.pdf to http://yosemite.epa.gov/sab/sabproduct.nsf/67057225CC780623852578F10059533D/$File/EPA-SAB-11-013-unsigned.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:53, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

Edits

I have looked through the article and it seems to be fine in terms of grammatical errors and such. I do believe that there should be more external links to articles as well as more up to date citations throughout the whole article.Nestorfi (talk) 20:46, 5 May 2018 (UTC)

Review comments (May 2021)

I am looking at this article in conjunction with eutrophication. Currently, the article is still very US-centric. The lead is more like a shopping list of brief notes not reflecting the content of the article. The illustrations are poor and captions just as poor. I think the article ought to be either completely focused on the United States (and the name changed). Or it should become streamlined with "eutrophication" - do we see it as a sub-article to "eutrophication"? Would it perhaps be better to merge them together, and to leave the US-focused part in an article called "nutrient pollution in the United States"? EMsmile (talk) 04:10, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Please note the continuation of this discussion is here. EMsmile (talk) 13:08, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

The topic is inherently global, as is 2/3rds of the article. The other 1/3 is in essence the government-related aspect and that portion currently just has US content. I'll leave it at that, with the main discussion being elsewhere. North8000 (talk) 13:35, 15 June 2021 (UTC)

I've done some work on this article today: I have moved the content that is very specific to the United States into a country examples section. I also tried to streamline the rest. But I am a bit lost what to do with the section that is currently called "Nutrients". And I still see some overlap with the article on eutrophication, e.g. in the sections on effects and an mitigation. To prevent too much duplication, I have added prominent links across to the eutrophication article. - Does anyone have ideas what new content should be added to the article that is specific to "nutrient pollution" and is not already available at "eutrophication"? EMsmile (talk) 04:26, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

A continuation of this merger discussion is here. Please continue the discussion there (not here) so that we don't end up having the same discussion in two places.EMsmile (talk) 08:58, 9 February 2022 (UTC)

Editing the lead

Dear BoldLuis Your edit of the first sentence in the lead needs modification. Since this is the sentence most people will read and it will also be excerpted on Google, it needs to be accurate. You claim that nutrient pollution is caused mainly by "THE industrial pollution and cattle raising". This is not true and the more complete explanations come later in the following sentences. When editing the lead it is important to read the lead and even the article first. With you permission I am deleting that edit. Best wishes. ASRASR (talk) 14:26, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

I agree. That far-reaching claim is dubious and unsourced as written. Also the lead is to be a summary of the body of the article and that claim is not even in the body of the article. North8000 (talk) 19:41, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.franklin.in.gov/egov/apps/document/center.egov?view=item;id=2881. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, provided it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you.  Velella  ^{Velella Talk}   09:00, 19 February 2023 (UTC)