Talk:Nullius in verba

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Latin Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Latin, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Latin on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LatinWikipedia:WikiProject LatinTemplate:WikiProject LatinLatin articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Philosophy: Science High‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles

High

This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated task forces:
/
	Philosophy of science

Comments edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The quote from the Royal Society Advertisement in this page does not seem to have the meaning the writer gives it. It appears to be a statement that the Royal Society does not (as a body) do endorsements, and nothing to do with independent-mindedness. After the quoted passage (ending "either of Nature or Art, that comes before them"), there is a paragraph explaining that applause at the end of a presentation should not be taken to mean that the Royal Society agrees with the presentation.

Matthew.brett (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 03:28, 18 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Translation edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Perhaps "nullius in verba" could be better translated into english as: "Test it by yourself..." And into spanish as "Compruebalo por ti mismo..." — Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.216.170.85 (talk) 08:14, 5 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

Cosmos reference edit

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Also noted that in Cosmos A Space Time Oddesy with Neil Degrasse Tyson Season 1 Episode 3 at 14:20 mark - they stated that it's latin for "see for yourself"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 196.45.31.239 (talk) 19:02, 11 June 2019 (UTC)Reply

Vowel length in "nullius" edit

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I deleted the following sentence: "Using macrons to indicate long vowels, the phrase can be written as Nūllīus in verba, where the stress accent in Nūllīus appears on the second-to-last syllable due to the long ī." While it is true that nullius normally has a long ī, standard dictionaries (e.g. Lewis & Short) note that this vowel can sometimes be short. In the Horace verse, it is necessarily short in order to fit the hexameter, so the deleted sentence is incorrect. (It is also irrelevant to understanding the pronunciation and meaning of the phrase in 17th-century Britain.) Crompticularity (talk) 05:44, 10 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic