Talk:Nuisance in English law/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Junipers Liege in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 04:16, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

I shall be undertaking the review of this article against the Good Article criteria, per its nomination for Good Article status. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 04:17, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Quick fail criteria assessment

edit
  1. The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
    •  
  2. The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
    •  
  3. There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
    •  
  4. The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
    •  
  5. The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
    •  

Article passes quick-fail assessment; main review to follow. ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 04:19, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Main review

edit
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):
    • Well written. Not overly technical or held down by legal "jargon".  
    b (MoS):
    • Conforms to manual of style.  
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):
    • Well referenced.  
    b (citations to reliable sources):
    • Citations are to third party publications. There is also a good variety of sources employed.  
    c (OR):
    • No evidence of OR.  
  3. It is broad in its scope.
    a (major aspects):
    • Addresses major aspect of article subject matter.  
    b (focused):
    • Remains focused. No digressions.  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy:
    • No issues concerning POV evident.  
  5. It is stable:
    • No edit wars etc.  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
    • Images are properly tagged and justified.  
    b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    • Images are accompanied by contextual captions. "Alt" text added to images.  
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail: PASS   ✽ Juniper§ Liege (TALK) 05:47, 2 April 2010 (UTC)Reply