Talk:Nucleus basalis

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Primefac in topic Requested move 6 March 2017

Unreliable source

edit

Why is Robert Twigger's comments about function taken as truth? He has no training in neurology or neuroscience.

Thanks for your observations. Wikipedia's an encyclopedia that anyone can contribute to, if you feel this statement is unreliable (and I agree with you that it is), please feel free to remove it. Cheers, --Tom (LT) (talk) 21:34, 25 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 6 March 2017

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved Primefac (talk) 12:55, 14 March 2017 (UTC)Reply


Nucleus basalis of MeynertNucleus basalis – TA preferred name, avoids use of eponym, easier and much more widely used Google search and ngrams Iztwoz (talk) 21:27, 6 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

I agree. Nucleus basalis is now more common and in this case makes perfect sense.Gcastellanos (talk) 18:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)Reply
Support per above proposal. --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:34, 12 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.