Talk:Nuclear power in Spain

Latest comment: 1 year ago by JonFredriksen in topic History section

Spanish nuclear programme

edit

I support the merger of Spanish nuclear programme into Nuclear power in Spain. Biscuittin (talk) 17:26, 28 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Gore citation

edit

This text "The factory in Arminiza has remained unfinished ever since.[1]" seems to have a few problems. First, it doesn't introduce what factory it is discussing, or why it's relevant. Secondly, there is apparently no "Arminiza" in Spain. It might mean Almarez -- but the plant there is still open. Fell Gleamingtalk 13:51, 18 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

References

  1. ^ Al Gore: Our Choice,A plan to solve the climate crises, Bloomsbury 2009 p. 157

Enviromental impact POV

edit

This section is strange, essay-ish and not concentrated on the environmental impact of nuclear plants, but rather of fossil fuel plants.--Carwil (talk) 13:53, 24 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Agreed. Removing... Bouchecl (talk) 02:25, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Naming

edit

There is a discussion which is also related to this article or category. You are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel (talk) 15:24, 2 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

References

edit

The historical part of the article is quite complete... but apparently comes from nowhere : there is no quotation, no reference, no nothing refering to the informations given, even in Spanish... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.13.145.11 (talk) 21:35, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Looks like it is a machine translation of an early version of es:Energía nuclear en España. Bouchecl (talk) 02:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Energy production per source

edit

There is a nice graph showing the energy production per source, with a time scale. The graph is colour coded, and the colours seem correct. Below the graph there are a few lines of comments. Below the comments there are four colour squares, and each square has an energy source.

I suggest that these squares, and their energy sources are removed. Reasons: 1) They are not needed since the colours are explained inside the graph. 2) Not all colours of the graph are included. 3) The colour for nuclear power is INCORRECT. The square is yellow, but it should be orange. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.224.170.33 (talk) 11:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

History section

edit

There are serious problems with the history section. Much of it is incomprehensible. In order to fix it, one would need more competence on the substance matter than I have. JonFredriksen (talk) 21:54, 1 March 2023 (UTC)Reply