Talk:Nuclear power in Spain

Spanish nuclear programme

I support the merger of Spanish nuclear programme into Nuclear power in Spain. Biscuittin (talk) 17:26, 28 February 2010 (UTC)

Gore citation

This text "The factory in Arminiza has remained unfinished ever since." seems to have a few problems. First, it doesn't introduce what factory it is discussing, or why it's relevant. Secondly, there is apparently no "Arminiza" in Spain. It might mean Almarez -- but the plant there is still open. Fell Gleaming^talk 13:51, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

References

Enviromental impact POV

This section is strange, essay-ish and not concentrated on the environmental impact of nuclear plants, but rather of fossil fuel plants.--Carwil (talk) 13:53, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Agreed. Removing... Bouchecl (talk) 02:25, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Naming

There is a discussion which is also related to this article or category. You are welcome to take a part of this discussion. Beagel (talk) 15:24, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

References

The historical part of the article is quite complete... but apparently comes from nowhere : there is no quotation, no reference, no nothing refering to the informations given, even in Spanish... — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.13.145.11 (talk) 21:35, 28 March 2012 (UTC)

Looks like it is a machine translation of an early version of es:Energía nuclear en España. Bouchecl (talk) 02:30, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

Energy production per source

There is a nice graph showing the energy production per source, with a time scale. The graph is colour coded, and the colours seem correct. Below the graph there are a few lines of comments. Below the comments there are four colour squares, and each square has an energy source.

I suggest that these squares, and their energy sources are removed. Reasons: 1) They are not needed since the colours are explained inside the graph. 2) Not all colours of the graph are included. 3) The colour for nuclear power is INCORRECT. The square is yellow, but it should be orange. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.224.170.33 (talk) 11:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

History section

There are serious problems with the history section. Much of it is incomprehensible. In order to fix it, one would need more competence on the substance matter than I have. JonFredriksen (talk) 21:54, 1 March 2023 (UTC)