Talk:Novum Instrumentum omne/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Pyrotec (talk) 17:47, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Starting review. Pyrotec (talk) 17:47, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Overall summary

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

---

A informative article; and well referenced.

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   Well referenced.

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   Well referenced.

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

The main body of the article provides good deal of information about this historical documents and this is supported by the WP:Lead which provides an Introduction to the main body of the article. The Lead is also intended to provide a concise summary of the main points in the article; and this needs some inprovement. Once that has been done Ii will awward the article the GA-status which it merits. Pyrotec (talk) 09:29, 5 April 2010 (UTC)

As the lead has now been brought up to standard, I'm happy to award the article GA-status. Congratulations in meeting the necessary standards. Pyrotec (talk) 15:00, 5 April 2010 (UTC)