Talk:Notion (philosophy)
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Carchasm in topic Notion is not a common philosophical concept?
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Quotations
edit- "...we call the nature or the essence of things their notion..."
- -- Hegel, Science of Logic, 2nd Preface
Pazouzou 08:53, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- Same quotation in the german original:
- "...so nennen wir die Natur oder das Wesen derselben ihren Begriff...", where Begriff corresponds to notion.
- 134.147.233.155 08:14, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hegel now incorporated into article. Contributions also welcome at Science of Logic. Rgdboer (talk) 02:30, 12 December 2016 (UTC)
Notion is not a common philosophical concept?
editThe article indicates that notion is the common translation of Hegel's "Begriff" - which isn't true anymore, the more common word used now to translate "Begriff" is "concept." Additionally, it's not clear from the article that this is in any way related to "notion" as mentioned by Descartes.
What it appears that we have here is a case where two different philosophers who wrote in two different languages both used words that one of their translators chose to translate into English as "notion." But no indication that those two concepts are directly related other than WP:SYNTH. I'm going to redirect this to Concept as the more common translation of Hegel. - car chasm (talk) 14:47, 20 August 2022 (UTC)