Talk:Nothofagus gunnii

Plants Low‑importance

	Plants portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Tasmania / Biota Low‑importance

	Australia portal Nothofagus gunnii is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tasmania (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian biota (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Tasmania.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Move to Fuscospora gunnii edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

The species Nothofagus gunnii has been moved to the new species Fuscospora gunnii^[1]

Should this page be moved and a redirect from this page be created?Its-mrb (talk) 03:11, 1 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Moved - Its-mrb (talk) 05:40, 11 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

References edit

^ HEENAN, PETER B.; SMISSEN, ROB D. (2013). "Revised circumscription of Nothofagus and recognition of the segregate genera Fuscospora, Lophozonia, and Trisyngyne (Nothofagaceae)". Phytotaxa. 146 (1): 131. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.146.1.1. Retrieved 31 May 2015.

Content needing to be copied from draft article edit

Latest comment: 8 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I've just stumbled upon the following article that was drafted up regarding F. Gunni but which was rejected, mainly because this article already existed.

Would an author with more expertise on this species like to review the content of the draft article with an eye to transferring the relevant material not already covered?

Link is here: Draft:Fuscospora_gunnii — Preceding unsigned comment added by Its-mrb (talk • contribs) 05:50, 11 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

New genera edit

Latest comment: 5 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The new genera (Lophozonia, Fuscospora etc.) have not been accepted outside New Zealand. For example, see:

https://biodiversity.org.au/nsl/services/search?product=APC&tree.id=51209179&name=Fuscospora+gunnii+%28Hook.f.%29+Heenan+%26+Smissen&inc._scientific=&inc.scientific=on&inc._cultivar=&max=100&display=apc&search=true

or

https://npgsweb.ars-grin.gov/gringlobal/taxonomydetail.aspx?id=467521

They were New Zealanders, who changed the nomenclature. As Nothofagus exists at least in six countries outside New Zealand (Indonesia, Papua New Guinea, France (New Caledonia), Australia, Chile, Argentina), Nothofagus should still be the genus name in Wikipedia. Thus, all the species articles, at least the species outside New Zealand, should be edited and the old names restored. Probably someone from New Zealand changed the genus names in Wikipedia. Now tree enthusiasts around the world are wondering, what is the valid name. Krasanen (talk) 17:33, 16 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic

[1] HEENAN, PETER B.; SMISSEN, ROB D. (2013). "Revised circumscription of Nothofagus and recognition of the segregate genera Fuscospora, Lophozonia, and Trisyngyne (Nothofagaceae)". Phytotaxa. 146 (1): 131. doi:10.11646/phytotaxa.146.1.1. Retrieved 31 May 2015.

[1]