Talk:Nothing but the Beat
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Nothing but the Beat article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editAny reason why the page isn't named Nothing But the Beat (the actual album name)?–Justin —Preceding undated comment added 04:28, 30 August 2011 (UTC).
- Agreed, in this case the word "but" is a preposition meaning "except", not a conjunction meaning "yet". Therefore it should be capitalised according to the Manual of Style. Patriarch (talk) 07:27, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
A. First Criteria- the article seems to be missing comprehensive information. Based on Wikipedia’s criteria “Comprehensive: neglects no major facts or details and place the subject on context.” I think that this article is missing a lot of important information from the album and artist, such as the production of the album; information like this is making the whole article not be comprehensive.
B. Second criteria- the content of the article should be well structured.
The “Wikipedia: featured article criteria” explains how a article needs to have a good structure by explaining the “Appropriate structure: a system of hierarchical section heading and a substantial but not overwhelming table of contents….” (Wikipedia). This article seems to have a weakness on the structure because it’s table of contents is missing important parts or information from the artist, such as a section of the background of the album or artist and also most topics can be better structured by putting them under other main topics as subtopics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jenniferjade1 (talk • contribs) 19:58, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Track listing
editI've been thinking about this for a while cause I don't think the current track listing is very legible, simply because it has a lot of information squashed into it. One suggestion would be using tables instead. I've mocked up what it might look like here. Could people let me know what they think? — Lil_℧niquℇ №1 [talk] 17:34, 23 December 2012 (UTC)
Oops lol
editI was trying to add the total length to the page, and. Well something happened. Idk how but I don't want to try and fix it in case I make it worse. My apologies Hello i am a gay (talk) 11:54, 26 November 2017 (UTC)