This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Latest comment: 6 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
@Valfontis: It's a little hard to tell exactly what style this is without any images. Is this distinct from the style of, say, Paul Thiry and Paul Hayden Kirk, or should they be mentioned here? - Jmabel | Talk 23:11, 30 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Jmabel: Hi, this is just a quick stub I cobbled together out of nothing with a crappy data dump of "see alsos" and not even completely cited (!), so it's not like it is the final word on anything. And you know how Oregon-centric I am. It does seem like a rather vaguely defined thing. According to University Unitarian Church, Kirk is indeed a practitioner of this style, as is Thiry, but looking over the history of the Thiry article, I can see there was a user who wasn't always scrupulous in correct citations who was a major contributor so I would dig a bit deeper to make sure there is a solid connection. But for sure add some Dawgs to those Ducks! Valfontis (talk) 19:29, 5 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
