This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject East Asia, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.East AsiaWikipedia:WikiProject East AsiaTemplate:WikiProject East AsiaEast Asia articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion
If this dynasty ended in the 1600s, why does the infobox list capitals only for the years 1368–1388? Can this be fixed? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 06:22, 24 April 2020 (UTC)Reply
If this dynasty ended in the 1600s, why does the infobox list capitals only for the years 1368–1388? Can this be fixed? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2021 (UTC)Reply
I don't know why English-language sources tend to extend the dynasty till the 17th century (other than, I suppose, to simplify the situation). As the article itself points out, the Yuan title was abolished in 1388, and that is where Chinese historiography tends to end the Northern Yuan. Thereafter the eastern and western Mongols are treated as separate regimes. Mongolian historiography also admits that there was then a period of disunity. Double sharp (talk) 20:08, 20 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Consensus to move - discussion has run a week, no oppose !votes, no obvious policy reasons not to move. If anyone sees any then please come find me at my talk page and I'll re-open the discussion. (non-admin closure) FOARP (talk) 14:16, 28 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.