Talk:Northern Territory National Emergency Response

Australia: Northern Territory / Indigenous peoples High‑importance

	Australia portal Northern Territory National Emergency Response is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Northern Territory (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indigenous peoples of Australia (assessed as Top-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the Northern Territory Library.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Human rights Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pornography Low‑importance

	Erotica and pornography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pornography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of pornography-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PornographyWikipedia:WikiProject PornographyTemplate:WikiProject PornographyPornography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Unballanced discussion edit

Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In the criticism and support sections the weight given to each is disproportionate. Opponents are lumped together and summarised heavily where supporters are each given paragraph long quotes. This gives the impression that support among indigenous Australians outweighs opposition, and that supporters are more coherent speakers. This is definitely not the case and this bias needs to be corrected. Djapa Owen (talk) 01:14, 25 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Northern Territory National Emergency Response. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:26, 12 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Missing context in introduction edit

Latest comment: 3 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

The introduction should make it clearer what NTER is really about. Currently, the first phrase talks about how NTER began (not what it is about) and does not even mention that it has something to do with Australia. While "Northern Territory" may be a hint, I suspect there may be more countries with a northern territory somewhere. The second sentence at least mentions Australia in passing, but then devolves into a long list of individual measures. In my understanding, a summary (not a complete list) of these measures together with the explicit mentioning of the affected country would be an appropriate first sentence; the task force and especially the media release are secondary. Of course, this point of view is shaped by me not being an Australian. I am not a native speaker, so I will not try to reformulate the introduction myself, but maybe my perspective helps in finding a more accessible wording. -- 84.63.126.251 (talk) 08:36, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I totally agree. Just not sure when I'll find the time to address it. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 09:17, 10 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

I've just done a big reshuffle, attempted to make WP:LEADFOLLOWSBODY and more comprehensible to non-Australians, etc. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 06:19, 21 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic