Talk:North Caucasian languages

Latest comment: 12 years ago by Aronlee90 in topic Something should be noted

Hurrians were Northeast-Caucasian People edit

  • Diakonov I.M., Starostin S.A. Hurro-Urartian as an Eastern Caucasian Languages. Münchener Studien zur Sprachwissenschaft, R. Kitzinger, München 1986.
  • Дьяконов И.М., Старостин С.А., Хуррито-урартские и восточнокавказские языки// Сб. "Древний Восток. Этнокультурные связи", стр. 164-208. Изд-во "Hаука", Главная редакция восточной литературы, Москва, 1988.
  • Дьяконов И.М. Языки древней Передней Азии. М. 1963.
  • Дьяконов И.М. Алародии (Хурриты, урарты, кутии, чеченцы и дагестанцы) // Сб. Алародии: этногенетические исследования. Махачкала, 1995.
  • Старостин С.А., Николаев С.Л. Севернокавказские языки и их место среди других языковых семей Передней Азии//Cб. Лингвистическая реконструкция и древнейшая история Востока. "Hаука", Главная редакция восточной литературы, Москва, 1984.--Awarenstuermer 12:19, 24 September 2006 (UTC)Reply
Nice, but some sources in English would be quite helpful. Do you happen to have any? (not that I cannot bite through Russian text) --Pet'usek [petrdothrubisatgmaildotcom] 22:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proto-North Caucasian edit

Below is my slowly growing suggestion for the part on PNC. I plan to use works by Nichols and Starostin/Nikolayev.

Nikolayev and Starostin reconstruct the following phoneme inventory for the North Caucasian proto-language:

Obstruents
Labials Dentals Velars Uvulars Epiglottals Glottals
(Interdentals) Alveolars Postalveolars Palatals Laterals
Stops voiceless (aspirated) p t k q ʡ ʔ
voiced b d g ɢ
glottalized p’ t’ k’ q’
Affricates voiceless (aspirated) (f) ts
voiced dz
glottalized ts’ tʃ’ tɕ’ tɬ’
Fricatives voiceless (θ) s ʃ ɕ ɬ x χ ʜ h
voiced (ð) z ʒ ʑ (ɮ) (ɣ) ʁ ʢ ɦ
Sonorants
Plain w r l
Glides j ɫ
Nasals m n

...oh, pity I don't have time to finish it now... --Pet'usek [petrdothrubisatgmaildotcom] 22:28, 4 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Glottochronological graph edit

Arguments over the validity of glottochronology notwithstanding, the majority of researchers consider Ubykh to be more closely related to Abkhaz-Abaza and not Circassian (see e.g. Viacheslav Chirikba's Common West Caucasian (1996), pp. 7-8, and also Wim Lucassen's paper Ubykh's Position in Northwest Caucasian (1997), in A Sumru Özsoy (ed.), Proceedings of the Conference on Northwest Caucasian Linguistics, Novus Forlag, Oslo), so even on its face the glottochronological tree graph doesn't accurately reflect the current consensus, and so it should be removed at least until it can be properly sourced. Thefamouseccles (talk) 02:14, 1 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Something should be noted edit

What's the relationship between this entry and Northeast Caucasian languages, are they the same? or some disambugiation is necessary?-Aronlee90 (talk) 11:18, 29 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

2.3 Some comparisons edit

There is table of Caucasian numerals in the sections "2.3. Some Comparisons" At the bottom it is noted that (S)=Schulze. Probably, it was not Schulze's reconstruction, but Starostins' one?