This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There have been several edits to this article which IMHO do not improve it. In an effort to achieve a consensus, I want to point them out here and propose some improvements:
History. Since the shipyard only lasted for a few years, almost everything about it is "history." I don't think that the "Production" section heading is descriptive, since it contains very little about production. IMHO the "Production" heading should be deleted.
Joyner Library. The existence of this collection of material is very notable. It even has its own web page. I think the complete reference should be retained and made a part of the body of the article (as opposed to keeping it as an External link).
Comments from other editors are invited. Lou Sander (talk) 12:46, 31 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
.jpg)
