Talk:North Bank Depot Buildings/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Jsayre64 in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Arsenikk (talk · contribs · count) 08:52, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- Comments
- It is very biased to presume that everyone knows what country Oregon is in. (fixed)
- Acres should be converted to hectares, not square km. (fixed)
- I've added some railway-station-specific categories.
- Thank you. I did removed one that was a parent category over another (see article history if needed). --Another Believer (Talk) 15:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- 'Great Northern' is a disambig link
- It is normally not necessary to create an external link section just for the Commons link, as this can be a box under see also. (Well-written articles often do not have external link sections), but I will not regard that as part of the review.
- My main concern is that part of the article lack references. Arsenikk (talk) 08:52, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The article looks pretty well-referenced to me. Which section in particular concerns you? --Another Believer (Talk) 15:35, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- The last part of the first paragraph in "background", where there is quite the description of the various railway along the Columbia river. This sort of stuff needs referencing. The second is the sentence "In the late 1990s, they were renovated and converted for residential use." Arsenikk (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks. I think I've fixed the problem now. Jsayre64 (talk) 19:37, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk) 19:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- Well done! --Another Believer (Talk) 21:39, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- Congratulations with a good article. Arsenikk (talk) 19:51, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- Alright, thanks. I think I've fixed the problem now. Jsayre64 (talk) 19:37, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
- The last part of the first paragraph in "background", where there is quite the description of the various railway along the Columbia river. This sort of stuff needs referencing. The second is the sentence "In the late 1990s, they were renovated and converted for residential use." Arsenikk (talk) 17:13, 2 October 2011 (UTC)
Awesome! Jsayre64 (talk) 02:19, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.