This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cold War, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Cold WarWikipedia:WikiProject Cold WarTemplate:WikiProject Cold WarCold War articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject NATO, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.NATOWikipedia:WikiProject NATOTemplate:WikiProject NATONATO articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I introduced the about template to distinguish the Atlantic Council from the North Atlantic Council. While the names are distinguishable, they can be confused, leading to interpretation of articles like this as if the NATO had decided military mobilization to deter Russia, which it hasn't, it's just the think tank... doing its... thing. -- Seelefant (talk) 20:36, 3 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The article is very poor in content and quality.
Even in general aspects as the one mentioning the "28 members meeting" when the picture attached has clearly more than 28 members attending. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.244.1.78 (talk) 10:02, 31 March 2014 (UTC)Reply
