This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
North-West Mounted Police in the Canadian north is part of the Scouting WikiProject, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Scouting and Guiding on the Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to boy and girl organizations, WAGGGS and WOSM organizations as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to Scouting. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ScoutingWikipedia:WikiProject ScoutingTemplate:WikiProject ScoutingScouting articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
"White unhappy about plans in the north in 1902." I want to fix it but I don't know what it's supposed to mean. Is White a guy's name? " Is White meaning White people? Is it a typo? If it is supposed to be "While unhappy...", then 'who' is unhappy in 1902? The sentence doesn't make sense. Masterhatch (talk) 12:19, 3 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
I removed that sentence. If someone knows what it means, by all means, but it back in!Masterhatch (talk) 02:33, 4 July 2021 (UTC)Reply
Charlene Porsild’s claim that Americans weren’t the majority of Klondike stampedersedit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Charlene Porsild’s claim that Americans weren’t a majority during the Klondike gold rush is problematic because she uses 1901 census data to assert that, yet less than half of the people living in Dawson City at that time participated in the 1897-98 rush. Most were newcomers.
During the rush itself North West Mounted Police Commander Charles Constantine, Yukon Commissioner James Walsh, and writers Frederick Palmer, Jeremiah Lynch, and Tappan Adney all wrote that Americans constituted a large majority of the stampeders. So who you going to believe - the officials and correspondents who were there in 1898, or Porsild a hundred years later using questionable statistical analysis? Ruthiegirl9 (talk) 07:18, 27 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
