Talk:Norsk Spisevognselskap/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 20:32, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:33, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Instead, it partly constructed a tourist hotel in the station building at Oppdal Station... needs a mention of the partner in this development, as otherwise the sentence is inconclusive. Not done

   I don't think I get what you mean, the operation was carried out by NSS through the Ministry of Transport and Communications. --Eisfbnore ^talk 14:33, 26 April 2011 (UTC)

   As of 2011, the state railways handles the catering service on trains by procurement. Do you mean tendered contracts? Done

   The lead doesn't summarise the last section fully. Not done

   I made a number of copy-edits.[1]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Referencing is good, sources appear RS, no evidence of OR. Assume good faith for off-line sources and those on-line in Norwegian.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   What happened to ReitanNarvesen? Who did it sell the rights to? As noted on the talk page, a little more about the company executives would be good, if it can be found. Not done

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 20:56, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

   Gimme ten minutes, please? --Eisfbnore ^talk 18:51, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

   Oh, sorry, I'm in another time zone so I actually have two hours left to go! --Eisfbnore ^talk 18:52, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

Ok hold extended until 20 April, will that do? Jezhotwells (talk) 21:07, 17 April 2011 (UTC)

There still remain un-addressed points, so I shall not be listing this article. Please work on these points and then re-nominate. Jezhotwells (talk) 00:10, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

I hope I have solved all these isssues by now. --Eisfbnore ^talk 10:38, 28 May 2011 (UTC)