Talk:Normalized difference vegetation index

This page does not mention Kriegler's contribution to the development of the NDVI. (Kriegler et al., 1969)

File:Landsat1.jpg Nominated for Deletion

	An image used in this article, File:Landsat1.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Media without a source as of 12 July 2011 What should I do?
	A discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. If you feel the deletion can be contested then please do so (commons:COM:SPEEDY has further information). Otherwise consider finding a replacement image before deletion occurs. This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 02:06, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Normalized difference vegetation index. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060510194120/http://www-gem.jrc.it/stars/vis.htm to http://www-gem.jrc.it/stars/vis.htm
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060513023840/http://fapar.jrc.it/ to http://fapar.jrc.it/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070304043130/http://www.ndvicentral.info/ to http://www.ndvicentral.info/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

== Suggested edit ==

Sorry if I'm not doing this right. I'm new at this. Anyway, on the article page, in the Rationale secion, it says, " because the photon energy at wavelengths longer than about 700 nanometers is too large to synthesize organic molecules". This doesn't make sense. Photon energies at longer wavelengths are *smaller*, not *larger*. ChristopherVolpe (talk) 17:44, 14 February 2019 (UTC)

=

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:46, 25 January 2018 (UTC)