Talk:Norah Head Light

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Muhandes in topic GA Review
Good articleNorah Head Light has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
November 21, 2010Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Norah Head Light/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: intelatitalk 01:21, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Minor thing, the Light keepers section should be expanded or combined into another section
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    nice range of sources
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    Understandable to the n00b
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    the only non free image can't be replaced, and adds to the value of the article
  7. Overall: One thing above needs to be done, and then I will pass the article
    Pass/Fail:  
I merged the light keepers section into the history section. --Muhandes (talk) 06:04, 21 November 2010 (UTC)Reply