Talk:Nontrivial

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Sbyrnes321 in topic antonym

antonym

edit

Is there any reason why the definition has to say an antonym for rather than the opposite of? It seems to make the concept needlessly complicated. I am changing it for now.--Physics is all gnomes (talk) 14:29, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Good for you, a lot of wikipedia readers don't speak English very well, so it's bad to use an less-common word when there's a more-common synonym that means the same thing and works just as well. (I am often replacing "utilize" with "use", "prophylactic" with "preventative", etc. etc.) :-) --Steve (talk) 16:40, 27 December 2010 (UTC)Reply