 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Vegaswikian (talk) 05:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)
Nono, Córdoba, Argentina → Nono, Córdoba – Per Wikipedia:Naming conventions (geographic names)#Argentina. Cambalachero (talk) 01:28, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support Avoid unusual double disambiguation. Kauffner (talk) 02:15, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support per WP:How2title... 1-it is a named entity with one obvious name... Nono, -Nono has other uses, 4-this is not the primary topic for Nono, 6-use the Principal Naming Criteria to decide:
- Recognizability – The title is a name or description of the subject that someone familiar with, although not necessarily an expert in, the subject area will recognize.
- Naturalness – The title is one that readers are likely to look or search for and that editors would naturally use to link to the article from other articles. Such a title usually conveys what the subject is actually called in English.
- Precision – The title unambiguously identifies the article's subject and distinguishes it from other subjects.
- Concision – The title is no longer than necessary to identify the article's subject and distinguish it from other subjects.
- Consistency – The title is consistent with the pattern of similar articles' titles. Many of these patterns are listed (and linked) as topic-specific naming conventions on article titles, in the box above.
- It's a draw on recognizability, but the proposed title beats the current title on naturalness, precision (current title is 'overly precise), conciseness, and consistency. --Born2cycle (talk) 02:55, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support. As B2C says, the proposed title is more natural, precise, concise and consistent. This could probably have been listed as an uncontroversial move. Jenks24 (talk) 09:35, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
- Support per the precision criterion of the Principal Naming Criteria. --Auntof6 (talk) 16:07, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.