Talk:Nomiki Konst

Notability

she is still pretty non-notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 152.7.255.196 (talk) 23:13, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

Hm? Being the subject of three non-trivial articles from national publications seals the deal for me. czar 23:15, 26 February 2019 (UTC)

I agree why is she notable? she should not have a wikipedia pageGemofadeal (talk) 04:49, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Trying something "neutral", PROD after AFD won't fly: Wikipedia:Help desk#History merge. –84.46.52.151 (talk) 04:15, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Added some 2017 sources from the history merge, good enough to get rid of my two {{fact}}, but not helping much with the notability. Thanks to Anthony Appleyard. –84.46.53.73 (talk) 15:27, 21 February 2020 (UTC)

Who are these trolls who are constantly trying to gut Wikipedia be removing legitinate content?

Give it a rest and allow us access to valuable information. ---Dagme (talk) 20:26, 28 October 2021 (UTC)

Nomiki Konst's date of birth / age

Konst's exact date of birth is mentioned in the article but her birthyear and age are mentioned as 1983/1984 and 35/36 respectively. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.55.220.127 (talk) 13:22, 20 October 2019 (UTC)

I've reset it to 1984 and fixed the bogus 1980 births category, per WP:DOB this needs at least a solid reference if relevant. –84.46.52.151 (talk) 03:07, 20 February 2020 (UTC)

Picture

I find that the image add by one editor[1] is contrary to Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images because it is not a "representative image." I assume that Konst doesn't normally walk around with her mouth wide open. TFD (talk) 16:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)

Maintenance Template

There is currently a maintenance template at the top of the article that says it reads like an advertisement. After carefully reading the entire article, I don't think this assessment is accurate. It reads like a solid Wikipedia article: relevant facts, presented from a neutral point of view, with no inappropriate promotional language that I can discern. Perhaps the article has been fixed since the template was added, and if that is the case, I respectfully suggest it should be removed. Thanks and happy editing! Chillowack (talk) 07:58, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

@Chillowack: I agree with you; i removed the template. It was added by Devonian Wombat (diff) on 16 August 2021. There was indeed a problematic sentence back then (i assume this is why the template was added), but has since been reworded by another user (diff). Demetrios1993 (talk) 17:32, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

Thanks Demetrios1993! Chillowack (talk) 20:10, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

She's running for office again, perhaps

According to 2022 New York State Senate election#Senate races, she's running to represent the post-redistricting 59 SD. The cited source is just a tweet, though. Perhaps a better source is needed. —⁠71.105.198.152 (talk) 13:58, 16 June 2022 (UTC)

I included some information about it. Demetrios1993 (talk) 13:55, 17 June 2022 (UTC)

Μπράβο. But according to the Astoria Post article, which is dated June 2, she made the announcement on the preceding Tuesday, which is May 31. —⁠71.105.198.152 (talk) 23:46, 18 June 2022 (UTC)

Yes, i did notice that as well, but it is a mistake by the author Christian Murray. The tweet he cites is dated June 1, and i just also confirmed that the episode was indeed aired on that day by checking the website of the Majority Report. You can listen to the same excerpt here; their MP3 player appears to be problematic because the timestamp keeps changing, but if you download and open the file on your computer, you can listen to the same excerpt between 1:05:58 and 1:14:39. Demetrios1993 (talk) 07:51, 20 June 2022 (UTC)