Talk:Noema

Philosophy Mid‑importance

	Philosophy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Philosophy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of content related to philosophy on Wikipedia. If you would like to support the project, please visit the project page, where you can get more details on how you can help, and where you can join the general discussion about philosophy content on Wikipedia.PhilosophyWikipedia:WikiProject PhilosophyTemplate:WikiProject PhilosophyPhilosophy articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Rewrite

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Work in progress. I will add some more references to Husserl, then a section quoting commentator's attempts to express what Husserl believed in simpler language. Finally a section on the dispute over the meaning of the term: Follesdal, Smith and McIntyre, Sokolowski, etc.KD Tries Again (talk) 19:36, 7 May 2009 (UTC)KD Tries AgainReply

Noema = Object of thought

Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

In Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason, A 21, footnote, he claimed that the words αισθητά και νοητά were very famous or well-known [sehr berühmt] in Greek philosophy. The Greek words mean “felt (or sensed) and thought.” The opposition is between that which is known through the sense organs (aestheta) and that which is known through pure thought (noeta).173.61.95.154 (talk) 23:36, 30 July 2019 (UTC)DaShawn McKee-CarterReply

Add topic