 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
 | The contents of the Nocaster page were merged into Telecaster on 6 July 2014. For the contribution history and old versions of the merged article please see its history. |
WikiProject class rating edit
This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as stub, and the rating on other projects was brought up to Stub class. BetacommandBot 16:37, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Editing paux pas? edit
In the revision of the article of 20:42, January 18, 2009, the line "This fact is irrelevant and confusing." was added, probably commenting on a previous editing. Is there a tag or template that would serve this purpose better than having this comment mid-article? De Moriarty (talk) 22:27, 31 January 2009 (UTC)
thinline nocaster edit
Also fender custom shop made a 20 piece special series of thinline nocasters in 2010. Although originally there was no thinline, these are called nocaster thinline and I think apart from the semi-hollow body are the same. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.72.8.198 (talk) 20:41, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
Merge? edit
Wouldn't this stub of information be more appropriately merged with the Telecaster article? The Telecaster is a major part of modern guitar history; the Nocaster is a chapter in the story of the Telecaster (along with eg. teh Squier Telecaster, a once-separate article which has been merged with Telecaster.) Frank Mottley (talk) 21:56, 10 June 2013 (UTC)
- Absolutely. Do the merge. The sooner the better. Be bold. BellwetherToday (talk) 04:37, 22 June 2014 (UTC)