Talk:Noble train of artillery/GA1

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Sturmvogel 66 in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 05:42, 10 February 2010 (UTC) GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteriaReply

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose quality:  
    B. MoS compliance:  
    Shouldn't this have an infobox?
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. References to sources:  
    B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:  
    B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  
Well, I knew that {{Infobox military conflict}} and other military infoboxes didn't apply. But I did find {{Infobox historical event}}, which seems to fit the bill. Magic♪piano 14:06, 10 February 2010 (UTC)Reply
That works for me.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:03, 10 February 2010 (UTC)Reply