A fact from Noa Denmon appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 11 December 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Children's literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Children's literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Children's literatureWikipedia:WikiProject Children's literatureTemplate:WikiProject Children's literaturechildren and young adult literature articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women artists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women artists on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women artistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women artistsTemplate:WikiProject Women artistsWomen artists articles
Latest comment: 2 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Comment: Regarding the first hook, I am also expanding A Place Inside of Me but plan to nominate it separately with a different hook as I don't feel that the Google Doodle is worthy of a mention in that article.
Created by DanCherek (talk). Self-nominated at 19:03, 17 November 2021 (UTC).Reply
New enough, long enough, and adequately sourced. QPQ done. The "a week after" part of one claim is not in the article or sources, but it's a simple calculation from the provided dates so I think we can let that pass. Other than that, the hook claims are properly sourced. Both hooks look interesting enough to me, and within length rules. Earwig found no significant copying. Good to go with either hook. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
New enough, long enough, and adequately sourced. QPQ done. The "a week after" part of one claim is not in the article or sources, but it's a simple calculation from the provided dates so I think we can let that pass. Other than that, the hook claims are properly sourced. Both hooks look interesting enough to me, and within length rules. Earwig found no significant copying. Good to go with either hook. —David Eppstein (talk) 23:43, 17 November 2021 (UTC)