Talk:No one likes us, we don't care
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Stub? edit
Is this someones idea of a joke? 'Arry Boy (talk) 16:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Perfectly serious question. Please have the common courtesy to reply. Thank you. 'Arry Boy (talk) 22:42, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Third time lucky, as they say. Will the person who rated this article as Stub Class, kindly exlplain their actions.? This article, in my opinion, cerainly needs to reassessed. Thank you. 'Arry Boy (talk) 13:28, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
It is now perfectly apparent, that there is only a very few people on this site, that have an understanding of common courtesy. If this article is a STUB why is it being mirrored and even "pinched" by other sites. If someone does not upgrade this article, I shall take it upon myself to do so. Thank you. 'Arry Boy (talk) 13:11, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
- The ratings system is nothing more than a mechanism to helps us prioritise which articles need work. It isn't intended as a system of judgement and really only provides a rough guide to article status. A bot running in the background summarises the information here. MRSC • Talk 10:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on No one likes us, we don't care. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090829153550/http://www.channel4.com:80/4car/ft/feature/feature/181/1 to http://www.channel4.com/4car/ft/feature/feature/181/1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:30, 21 January 2016 (UTC)