Talk:No Small Affair
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Starhistory22 in topic Doesn't WIKI Need a Clear Marker ....
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
I have seen the film back in 1986 on cable; these days, DSLRs are frequently used rather than 35mm (as depicted in the film). A cult favorite for photographers... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.196.138.68 (talk) 22:49, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
Doesn't WIKI Need a Clear Marker .... edit
.... to designate films that did not even break even, at their own budget?
In other words, they LOST money. This should be evident in some way, immediately, to the reader, with a clear marker/label.
Perhaps a symbol and label as 'DOG'.
Or maybe 'LOSER'.
Meaning, they lost the gamble of business risk, for the money invested.
I would like to see the "dogs" immediately, in all WIKI listings, even during the Search info and disambiguations.
Starhistory22 (talk) 04:08, 8 September 2014 (UTC)