Talk:No Pressure (film)/GA2

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Jezhotwells in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 02:09, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: one found and fixed.[1] Jezhotwells (talk) 02:13, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Substantive review will be posted within 24 hours. Jezhotwells (talk) 02:16, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Checking against GA criteria

edit
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):  
    Lead: Short sentences need consolidating perhaps two paras for a short article such as this.
    A large number of short or single sentence paragraphs throughout the article need consolidation.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
    One citation needed tag on the film's production needs addressing.
    References check out, no OR.
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
    sufficient detail.
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    One image used with suitable non-free use rationale.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    On hold for seven days for above issues to be addressed. Jezhotwells (talk) 14:12, 25 March 2011 (UTC)Reply
    OK, good to go. Congratulations! Jezhotwells (talk) 11:56, 28 March 2011 (UTC)Reply