Talk:No Muss...No Fuss

Fair use rationale for Image:Nomussnofuss.jpg

Image:Nomussnofuss.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 16:54, 2 January 2008 (UTC)

Need for a Disambiguation Page

Since the phrase "no-muss, no-fuss" (or sometimes, "no-fuss, no-muss") has other meanings in its popular usage, someone needs to create a disambiguation page to that effect. Any online search through reputable dictionaries refer to this phrase in relation to a process or activity that can be conducted in an easy and unobtrusive way.

Still, others refer to 'no muss, no fuss' as 'no muss, no fuss, no bother', which, in essence, means the same thing.

There is also a reference to the 1930s, Sherwin-Williams product, "Kem-Tone", wherein the advertising slogan was "No muss, no fuss, no bother."

Additionally, a "western swing" singer by the name of Hank Penny released "No Fuss, No Muss, No Bother" ..can't recall the year, however.

My point is this: having only one wikipedia page that attributes this phrase to a music act is not only inaccurate, but it is also blaringly inadequate. Thanks. McPhersonddx (talk) 15:59, 1 December 2011 (UTC)