Talk:No. 4 Squadron RAF
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Nigel Ish in topic Orphaned references in No. 4 Squadron RAF
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
Orphaned references in No. 4 Squadron RAF edit
I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of No. 4 Squadron RAF's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.
Reference named "RAF":
- From No. 27 Squadron RAF: "27 Squadron". Royal Air Force. Retrieved 29 December 2009.
- From No. 81 Squadron RAF: "81 Squadron". Royal Air Force. Retrieved 30 December 2009.
- From No. 103 Squadron RAF: "No. 103 Squadron". raf.mod.uk. Royal Air Force. Retrieved 2009-01-25.
- From No. 39 Squadron RAF: "39 Squadron". Royal Air Force, Retrieved 14 March 2009.
- From No. 82 Squadron RAF: 82 Squadron. Royal Air Force. Retrieved 18 October 2009.
I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 19:30, 11 August 2010 (UTC)