Talk:No. 2 Operational Conversion Unit RAAF/GA1
Latest comment: 10 years ago by Ian Rose in topic GA Review
GA Review edit
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Dank (talk · contribs) 20:01, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
Review
- According to the toolbox, it's possible there's a better link for "Canopy believed cause of Sabre pilot deaths (info) [nla.gov.au]".
- Interesting, the automated dab checker didn't send me a reminder this time... ;-)
- "{"The Young Shall Have Wings")": ("The Young Shall Have Wings")
- Tks -- surprised it didn't draw attention to itself by clobbering the infobox, temperamental things they are...!
- "During the war it had graduated 1,247 pilots, losing 45 students in fatal accidents.": This question is actually about a current FAC and not this article ... have you heard anyone claim before that "losing" is in the wrong tense in BritEng?
- Don't know about BritEng per se but it's common wordage when discussing casualties, certainly in the Commonwealth-focussed sources I use.
- Two images are missing.
- Missing... what...? :-)
- The links to the images were broken ... they're fine now. - Dank (push to talk)
- Missing... what...? :-)
- "Sabre Trials Flight. The flight was responsible": I'd prefer the reader get some kind of clue here that this is not the usual meaning of "flight"
- Link "flight" to flight (military unit)?
- Sure. - Dank (push to talk) 01:58, 27 June 2013 (UTC)
- Link "flight" to flight (military unit)?
- "in the shape of": I'd prefer "in the form of"
- Well I'd hope to avoid the "formation ... form" repetition...
- "frontline", "front-line" (as an adjective): consistency. FWIW, AmEng is "frontline".
- Otherwise:
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- - Dank (push to talk) 20:41, 26 June 2013 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail:
Passed - Dank (push to talk) 01:58, 27 June 2013 (UTC)